Page 659 - Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Encryption: Allows votes to be processed and counted while blockchain and verifiable audit mechanisms.
remaining encrypted, ensuring privacy and integrity.
Increased Security: Prevention of vote manipulation,
Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): Enables independent hacking, and insider fraud.
verification of the voting process without revealing voter
Scalability and Adaptability: A model that can be
identities.
implemented across different election systems worldwide.
C. Vote Storage and Transmission Layer: Blockchain- Public Trust and Adoption: Higher voter participation due to
Enabled Transparency
Permissioned Blockchain Network: Secure, decentralized increased trust in digital voting process
storage where votes are recorded as immutable transactions, Performance Evaluation :
preventing tampering or deletion. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed transparent e-
voting framework, a detailed performance evaluation is
Smart Contracts: Automatically validate and tally votes, conducted based on key metrics such as security,
reducing human errors and bias.
transparency, efficiency, scalability, and usability. This
Distributed Ledger Auditing: Ensures all stakeholders, section outlines the evaluation criteria, testing
including election monitors, can independently verify vote methodologies, and results.
integrity.
1. Performance Evaluation Metrics
D. Vote Counting and Result Verification Layer The proposed e-voting framework is evaluated based on the
Multi-Party Computation (MPC): Prevents a single entity following metrics:
from controlling election results, ensuring decentralized
processing. A. Security and Integrity
Resistance to Cyber Threats: Assesses the system's ability to
Publicly Auditable Logs: Allow independent organizations prevent attacks such as hacking, vote tampering, and denial-
and observers to verify the integrity of vote counting without of-service (DoS) attacks.
compromising voter privacy.
End-to-End Encryption: Measures the effectiveness of
Post-Election Audits: Conduct cryptographic audits to cross- cryptographic techniques in maintaining voter privacy.
check vote integrity and confirm that results are accurate.
Blockchain Immutability: Evaluates the integrity of stored
E. Voter Feedback and Trust Layer votes, ensuring that no alterations are possible.
Receipt-Based Verification: Voters receive cryptographic
B. Transparency and Verifiability
receipts allowing them to verify their vote inclusion in the
Voter Verifiability: Analyzes whether voters can
final tally.
independently verify that their vote was recorded and
Transparency Dashboard: A public-facing system displaying counted correctly.
real-time election statistics, ensuring openness.
Auditability: Measures the ability of third-party observers to
Legal and Ethical Compliance Checks: Ensures alignment verify election results through blockchain and cryptographic
with national and international election security regulations. proofs.
2. Research Methodology Public Trust Index: Evaluates voter confidence in the system
The study will use a combination of qualitative and through user surveys.
quantitative research methodologies to evaluate the
C. System Efficiency and Scalability
effectiveness of the proposed e-voting framework.
Transaction Processing Speed: Measures how quickly votes
A. Simulation and Security Analysis are recorded and confirmed in the blockchain.
Threat Modeling and Penetration Testing: Simulates
cyberattacks to evaluate vulnerabilities in the system. Network Scalability: Tests the system’s ability to handle high
voter turnout without performance degradation.
Blockchain Security Testing: Assesses the integrity, Resource Utilization: Evaluates CPU, memory, and
immutability, and resistance of the ledger against attacks.
bandwidth consumption for different voting scenarios.
B. Experimental Implementation and User Testing
D. Usability and Accessibility
Prototype Development: A functional prototype of the
User Experience Testing: Conducts surveys to assess ease of
proposed e-voting system will be built.
use for voters and election officials.
User Experience Evaluation: Tests system usability and voter
trust levels using surveys and feedback. Accessibility for Disabled Voters: Measures system
adaptability for visually impaired and physically challenged
Pilot Elections: Conducts controlled voting trials to validate voters.
transparency and efficiency.
Error Rate: Tracks system errors, including failed vote
C. Comparative Analysis with Existing Systems submissions and authentication failures.
Benchmarking Against Traditional E-Voting Systems:
2. Experimental Testing and Simulation
Compares security, transparency, and trust levels.
To evaluate the proposed framework, a prototype system is
Legal and Ethical Impact Assessment: Reviews compliance developed and tested under simulated election conditions.
with election laws and data privacy regulations. The following approaches are used:
3. Expected Outcomes of the Research Model A. Security Stress Testing
Enhanced Transparency: Improved voter confidence through Penetration Testing: Ethical hacking is performed to identify

IJTSRD | Special Issue on Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies Page 649