Page 506 - Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies
P. 506
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
IV. DATA PRE-PROCESSING
Data pre-processing is the very important level of any studies.
To prepare the “Academic Database” dataset for training and testing Originality Guard, a crucial step was tokenization. This
involved splitting documents into individual words or tokens, facilitating analysis and enabling the algorithm to focus on
meaningful content. Tokenization helped to break down complex texts into manageable components, allowing for more
accurate processing and analysis.
The next step was stopword removal, which eliminated common words like "the," "and," and "a" that do not carry significant
meaning. These stopwords can create noise in the dataset, potentially misleading the algorithm. By removing them, the dataset
became more refined, enabling Originality Guard to focus on relevant content. This step also reduced the dimensionality of the
dataset, making it more computationally efficient.
Following stopword removal, stemming was applied to reduce words to their base form. The Porter Stemmer algorithm was
employed for this purpose, ensuring consistency in word representation. Stemming helped to conflate related words, reducing
the impact of grammatical variations and enabling this tool to capture semantic relationships between words. This step
enhanced the algorithm's ability to detect plagiarism, even when Plagiarists attempt to disguise copied content through minor
modifications.
To further refine the dataset, lemmatization was applied using the WordNet lemmatizer. This step converted words to their
dictionary form, ensuring that words with multiple meanings were accurately represented. Lemmatization helped to capture
subtle nuances in language, enabling Originality Guard to detect plagiarism that might have been missed through stemming
alone. By combining stemming and lemmatization, the dataset became even more accurate and reliable.
Noise reduction was another essential step in preparing the dataset. Special characters, punctuation, and irrelevant symbols
were removed, ensuring that the dataset consisted only of meaningful content. This step also helped to eliminate any
formatting inconsistencies, making it easier for Originality Guard to process the data. By removing noise, the dataset became
more consistent and accurate, enabling Originality Guard to detect plagiarism with greater precision.
Finally, data cleaning was performed to eliminate duplicate documents, empty files, and irrelevant content. This step ensured
that the dataset was free from errors and inconsistencies, providing a solid foundation for training and testing Originality
Guard. By applying these six preprocessing steps, the Academic Database dataset was transformed into a high-quality, reliable
resource that enabled Originality Guard to detect plagiarism with unparalleled accuracy.
In summary to that,
Tokenization: Broke down texts into individual words or tokens.
Stopword removal: Eliminated common words with no significant meaning.
Stemming and lemmatization: Standardized word forms for consistency.
Noise reduction: Removed special characters, punctuation, and irrelevant symbols.
Data cleaning: Eliminated duplicates, empty files, and irrelevant content.
These steps ensured a refined and error-free dataset for training and testing Originality Guard.
V. PROPOSED RESEARCH MODEL
The proposed research model for Originality Guard adopts a hybrid approach, integrating natural language processing (NLP)
and machine learning (ML) techniques. This integrated framework enables the model to effectively detect plagiarism in
academic texts.
The model comprises four primary components. The first component, Text Preprocessing, involves tokenization, stopword
removal, stemming, and lemmatization. These processes prepare the text data for analysis by breaking down complex texts into
manageable components and eliminating irrelevant words.
The second component, Feature Extraction, utilizes NLP techniques to extract relevant features from the preprocessed text
data. Techniques such as part-of-speech tagging and named entity recognition enable the model to identify patterns and
relationships within the text, facilitating accurate plagiarism detection.
The third component, Plagiarism Detection, employs ML algorithms to detect plagiarism based on the extracted features.
Support vector machines (SVM) and random forests are used to analyze the features and identify instances of plagiarism. This
component enables Originality Guard to accurately detect plagiarism, even in cases where perpetrators attempt to disguise
copied content.
The final component, Post-processing, involves filtering and ranking the detected plagiarism instances to provide a
comprehensive report. This report enables users to easily identify instances of plagiarism and take necessary actions. By
integrating these four components, Originality Guard provides an effective and efficient solution for detecting plagiarism in
academic texts.
Additionally, the research model for Originality Guard has been extensively evaluated using a range of metrics, including
precision, recall, and F1-score. The results demonstrate that the model is highly effective at detecting plagiarism, even in cases
where perpetrators attempt to disguise copied content. The model has also been compared to existing plagiarism detection
tools, and the results demonstrate that Originality Guard outperforms these tools in terms of accuracy and efficiency.
IJTSRD | Special Issue on Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies Page 496