Page 35 - Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies
P. 35

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470

















               Accuracy: The  system demonstrated an overall accuracy of 93.6%, highlighting its reliable performance in diagnosing and
                classifying animal health status.
               Precision: The precision is 0.89, which means the system is less likely to return false positives, so if it predicts a case is
                positive, this  prediction coincides with a real positive case.
               Recall: Recall  is 0.86, reflecting the ability of the system to flag true positive cases, therefore limiting the risk of undetected
                conditions.
               F1 Score: With an F1 score of 0.88, a well-balanced  performance has been achieved — optimizing precision, as well as
                recall.
             Training and Validation Analysis
             Training & Validation Accuracy: The accuracy of the system improved with epochs during training and  stabilized high.
             Validation accuracy closely tracked the training accuracy, confirming generalizability  of the system to unseen data
             Training and Validation Loss The loss of training showed a continuous  decrease as we proceed through the epochs, showing
             good learning. Likewise, validation loss followed a downward trajectory, indicating that the model was not overfitting and
             retained  strong predictive power on unseen data.
             Result Significance:
             The performance of the proposed Smart Animal Care system highlights  its transformative potential for veterinary diagnostics:
             1.  Enables accurate and automated predictions to lower diagnostic  errors.
             2.  Efficiency gains are reducing the time between  diagnosis and treatment leading to improved outcomes in animal health.
             3.  The scalability of the system ensures its applicability in both small and  large veterinary practices.






























             Aligned with  that the following is a comparison graph of   3.  Cost Effectiveness: Smart technologies offer better cost
             traditional  methods  deployed  versus  smart  technologies   benefits.
             used in the veterinary practice based on the metrics -   4.  Patient Outcomes: Significant  improvement in animal
             1.  Smart technologies are way better than  traditional ways   recovery and care.
                when it comes to the accuracy of diagnosis.
                                                                5.  User  Adoption:  Adoption  rates  tend  to  be  higher  for
             2.  Hour  Saving:  Quicker  operations  with  intelligent
                                                                   smart  technologies.
                technologies.

             IJTSRD | Special Issue on Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies   Page 25
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40