Page 521 - Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies
P. 521
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
· Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will evaluate the comprehensive performance evaluation framework. This
system's clinical accuracy and effectiveness. framework encompasses multiple metrics, methodologies,
· Surveys and interviews will assess user satisfaction and and tools to assess the system's accuracy, usability,
perceived value. efficiency, and overall impact.
Data Sources: 1. Objectives of Performance Evaluation
· Data from wearables (e.g., heart rate, sleep patterns). To determine the accuracy and reliability of the Mental
· Self-reported data from mobile apps (e.g., mood Well System in detecting psychological disorders such as
trackers). depression, anxiety, and PTSD.
· Passive data from digital activity (e.g., social media To assess the user experience, including ease of use,
analysis). satisfaction, and engagement.
Participant Sampling: To evaluate the scalability and real-world applicability
· A diverse sample of individuals with varying mental of the system in diverse populations.
health conditions will be recruited.
· Participants will be randomly assigned to intervention 2. Evaluation Metrics
(using the system) or control (traditional methods) The performance of the Mental Well System will be assessed
groups. based on the following metrics:
Clinical Accuracy:
6. Evaluation Metrics
The effectiveness of the system will be measured using: · Sensitivity and Specificity: Measure the system’s
Clinical Metrics: Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of ability to correctly identify individuals with and without
psychological disorder detection. psychological disorders.
· Precision and Recall: Evaluate the relevance and
Usability Metrics: Perceived ease of use and user completeness of the identified conditions.
satisfaction (via TAM-based surveys).
Usability:
Engagement Metrics: Frequency of system use and · User satisfaction scores from surveys based on the
adherence to recommended interventions. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM).
7. Expected Outcomes · System learnability, as measured by task completion
The research model anticipates the following outcomes: time during onboarding.
Demonstration of the system’s effectiveness in early
Engagement:
detection of psychological disorders. · Frequency and duration of system use by participants.
Identification of factors driving user acceptance and · Adherence to system recommendations, such as
engagement. engaging with interventions or resources.
Evidence supporting the scalability and practicality of Scalability:
the Mental Well System. · The system's ability to handle large datasets and
concurrent users without performance degradation.
8. Challenges and Mitigation ·
Data Privacy: Implementation of robust encryption and Evaluation of resource efficiency, including
computational and data storage requirements.
ethical guidelines to protect user information.
Ethical and Privacy Compliance:
Algorithm Bias: Regular validation of machine learning ·
models with diverse datasets. Adherence to data protection regulations such as GDPR
and HIPAA.
User Resistance: Iterative refinement of the system
interface based on feedback.
Fig.3 prevalence rates
3. 3. Performance Evaluation Methodology
Fig.2 pillars of psychology Controlled Experiments:
· Conduct randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with two
V. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
The effectiveness of the Mental Well System in identifying groups: an intervention group using the Mental Well
System and a control group following traditional
psychological disorders will be evaluated using a
diagnostic methods.
IJTSRD | Special Issue on Emerging Trends and Innovations in Web-Based Applications and Technologies Page 511