Page 22 - Special Issue Modern Trends in Scientific Research and Development, Case of Asia

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470

Table 3: Intercorrelational relationships of aggression outcomes (based on Bass-Dark)
*p<0,05: **р<0,01

Types of Physical Verbal Indirect
Negativism Tension Suspicion Sadness Guilt.
aggression aggressionагрессия aggression aggression
Physical
1 0,201** -0,293** -0,306** -0,394** -0,062 0,499** -0,133*
aggression
Verbal
1 -0,103 -0,358** -0,440** -0,177** -0,353** -0,102
aggression
Indirect
1 -0,001 -0,052 -0,305** -0,097 -0,167**
aggression
Negativism 1 0,139* -0,233** -0,006 -0,187**
Tension 1 -0,004 0,251** -0,083
Suspicion 1 0,100 -0,065
Sadness 1 -0,010
Guilt 1

However, the value in “anti-rule behavior form” had an factor questionnaire. The methodology was conducted in
inversely correlated relationship with the remaining values ( both the training group and the control group students. The
is equal to r= -0,293, r= -0,306, r=- 0,358, r=-0,133, p<0,01). personality traits of group students with low levels of
In addition, students have not yet been able to develop their aggression and students of groups with high levels of
creative potential, to be active enough in social relationships, aggression differed. In a group of students who exhibited
to be able to work on themselves, to develop willpower, to be aggression and hostility at the norm level, factor A was
dissatisfied with their work and performance, to have the significant (r = 1,68;), which meant that students in this
ability to evaluate their behavior. it is obvious that they are group had high levels of openness and sincerity in
not formed and do not have the ability to form independent communication. In the group of students with high
opinions in the acquisition of knowledge. aggression, the level of communication can be seen.
Significant negative (-0,98**; p< 0.01) correlation was
III year students who participated in the study had a identified in the second group on the F-phase (reasonable) -
broader understanding, which in turn meant that sensitivity (excitement) factor.This means that the more
they had a higher level of psychological and aggressive and hostile a person is, the more likely he or she
security information. We believe that the process of is to complicate everything, take everything seriously, and be
forming information psychological security in affected. L– reliability - a negative (-2,86*; p< 0.05)
students will be successful if they have a high level of correlation in the first group and a positive (0,34**; p< 0.01)
awareness of the threat and its consequences. correlation in the second group.

Based on the results of the conducted methods, students can This means that a person who is in the norm of aggression
be divided into the following groups: thinks that everyone is kind and good, speaks openly even to
a group of students with a very low level of aggression people he does not know well, easily trusts them with their
and hostility, competence to eliminate the threat; secrets, values, is a compassionate, cheerful, kind person in
a group of students with the ability to partially eliminate the community. The higher the level of aggression and
a threat with moderate aggression and hostility; hostility, the more cautious the students in this group will be,
a group of students with a high level of aggression and the more likely they will be misunderstood in the first place.
hostility, who do not have the competence to eliminate They see evil everywhere and do not trust anyone. They are
the threat. not sincere with their friends, claiming that they are capable
of injustice. Others in the team are jealous of success. They
We believe that by identifying a group of students with a think they are not valued. They are strict in their dealings
high level of aggression and hostility, a high risk of with people, but they don’t like competition. A negative (-
intimidation, and working with them on the basis of a 1,15*; p< 0.05) correlation was found in the first group on
training program, it is possible to bring the student's the factor of propensity to O - self-confidence - guilt. This
personal aggression and hostility to the norm. means that if the aggression is normal or low, the person will
be cheerful, cheerful, satisfied with life, confident in their
The third chapter of the research, entitled "Socio- abilities and luck. They pay close attention to all that is
psychological analysis of the qualities associated with happening.
information psychological security in youth" highlights
the threats expressed in society, the results of monitoring the No such link was identified in the second group. Q2 -
effectiveness of psycho correctional program, psycho conformism (group dependence) - a positive (2,07** p< 0.05)
correctional training. correlation was found in the second group on the
independence factor.Based on the result, it means that the
An analysis of the methodologies conducted after the higher the aggression, the more likely they are to give up any
psychological trainings aimed at the formation of facilities to maintain their independence and ignore the
information psychological security and the comparative opinions of others in their activities.
results of the methods of clarifying experiments were
conducted. In order to determine the socio-psychological R. Through the Kettell test, students ’personal characteristics
characteristics of the aggressor, we used R. Kettell’s 16- were explored. The test was calculated and analyzed

ID: IJTSRD35771 | Special Issue on Modern Trends in Scientific Research and Development, Case of Asia Page 17